Beige Book
National Summary
November 15, 1978
Generally good economic conditions prevail across most of the
nation, although there is notable uncertainty over economic
prospects. Retail sales have been fairly steady overall—consumer
durables have been selling somewhat better than nondurables.
Agricultural and industrial production has been strong. Construction
activity is mixed, with some increases in commercial construction
and some decreases in homebuilding. Inventories are lean almost
everywhere. Financial markets continue to be tight. But despite
fairly positive assessments of current economic conditions, reports
from most districts reveal substantial uncertainty regarding future
economic developments due in part to the evolving anti-inflation
program.
Retail sales have held up in recent weeks throughout most of the
nation. Strong consumer demand was reported in Boston, Chicago, St.
Louis, Dallas, Minneapolis, and San Francisco. The weakest demand
was observed in New York, Philadelphia, and Atlanta. In between,
retail sales ranged from slightly above last year to 10 percent
above last year in Kansas City.
Chicago was the only district reporting relatively better soft goods
sales than hard goods sales. In Richmond, Atlanta, and Minneapolis
the reverse was noted. Several districts indicated that auto and
light truck sales did not adequately reflect demand, as slow
deliveries held actual sales below potential levels.
Auto dealers aren't the only business people with low inventories.
Nearly every district notes the lean inventory positions of most
retailers. Some soft goods dealers in Boston, Atlanta, and
Minneapolis are concerned about inventory creep, but this concern is
much less prevalent than satisfaction with inventory levels. Reports
from manufacturers throughout the U.S. reveal that the overwhelming
majority are maintaining very tight inventory positions.
Since inventories are low, strong demand for manufactured goods has
been reflected in healthy industrial activity. For instance, Chicago
reports that most producers of capital goods continue to report
rising shipments, new orders, and backlogs. Only New York
characterizes manufacturing activity as flat, while all other
districts cite improvements.
Improvements in agricultural production are also widespread.
Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, and Minneapolis all note good
agricultural production. And prices are holding up so that crop
values are quite impressive. Livestock producers throughout the
nation are also reaping the benefits of high prices.
Recent trends in the construction sector are not so clear-cut as
they are in agriculture—commercial construction remains strong but
homebuilding has weakened. Atlanta, St. Louis, and Minneapolis each
report active commercial building. Meanwhile, most districts state
that a homebuilding slowdown is imminent or had already begun.
High interest rates are cited most frequently as the reason for the
housing slowdown. St. Louis, Minneapolis, and San Francisco remark
that usury laws are making mortgage funds particularly scarce in
parts of their districts. Regulation Q is also mentioned as having a
detrimental impact on the ability of banks and thrifts to attract
funds. The newly legalized automatic transfer service at commercial
banks was supposed to have relieved some of the negative aspects of
Regulation Q, but at least according to Atlanta, Minneapolis, and
Dallas consumer interest in the ATS is currently quite limited.
This lack of interest contrasts with the public response to other
recent Administration and Federal Reserve policy actions. New York,
Atlanta, and Chicago report skepticism concerning the likelihood
that wage-price guidelines would work. Furthermore, each of these
banks notes public concern that the guidelines will turn into
mandatory controls with the attendant inefficiencies. Reactions to
discount rate and reserve requirement increases are mixed. For
example, Atlanta finds that some observers are "reassured that
something concrete has been done toward alleviating the inflation
and exchange rate situations," while a few others feel the actions
were "excessive or dangerous."
Uncertainty associated with the evolving anti-inflation program complicates economic forecasting. Districts report widely divergent
opinions on the probability of a recession and on the chances that
inflation and interest rates will moderate during the coming year.
Boston's panel of experts reflects this diversity of opinion;
Professor Eckstein argues that the odds now favor a recession in
1979, Professor Houthakker feels the odds are against recession in
1979, and Professor Samuelson suggests that government policy will
have a substantial influence on what transpires and that recession
is not inevitable. Similarly, opinions on inflation prospects range
from less than the guidelines, according to some Philadelphia
respondents, to substantially higher, according to some observers in
Atlanta and Cleveland.