Quarterly Review 1741

Back to Publication

In Order to Form a More Perfect Monetary Union

Arthur J. Rolnick - Senior Vice President and Director of Research, 1985-2010
Bruce D. Smith
Warren E. Weber - Retired Economist

Fall 1993

Why did states agree to a U.S. Constitution that prohibits them from issuing their own money? This article argues that two common answers to this question—a fear of inflation and a desire to control what money qualifies as legal tender—do not fit the facts. The article proposes a better answer: a desire to form a viable monetary union that both eliminates the variability of exchange rates between various forms of money and avoids the seigniorage problem that otherwise occurs in a fixed exchange rate system. Supporting evidence is offered from three periods of U.S. history: the colonial period (1690–1776), the Revolutionary War (1776–83), and the Confederation period (1783–89). This article is adapted from a chapter prepared for a forthcoming book, Varieties of Monetary Reforms: Lessons and Experiences on the Road to Monetary Union, edited by Pierre Siklos, to be published by Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Download Paper (PDF)


Movin' on up, fedgazette, October 2014

Related Links