Staff Report 418

Back to Publication

Using the General Equilibrium Growth Model to Study Great Depressions: A Reply to Temin

Timothy J. Kehoe - Consultant
Edward C. Prescott - Senior Monetary Advisor

Published December 17, 2008

Abstract
Three of the arguments made by Temin (2008) in his review of Great Depressions of the Twentieth Century are demonstrably wrong: that the treatment of the data in the volume is cursory; that the definition of great depressions is too general and, in particular, groups slow growth experiences in Latin America in the 1980s with far more severe great depressions in Europe in the 1930s; and that the book is an advertisement for the real business cycle methodology. Without these three arguments — which are the results of obvious conceptual and arithmetical errors, including copying the wrong column of data from a source — his review says little more than that he does not think it appropriate to apply our dynamic general equilibrium methodology to the study of great depressions, and he does not like the conclusion that we draw: that a successful model of a great depression needs to be able to account for the effects of government policy on productivity.


Download Paper (PDF)

 
Latest

Movin' on up, fedgazette, October 2014