Neil Wallace - Consultant
Revised October 1, 1996
Abstract
Using an existing random matching model of money, I show that a once-for-all change in the quantity of money has short-run effects that are predominantly real and long-run effects that are in the direction of being predominantly nominal provided (i) the quantity of money is random and (ii) people learn about what happened to it only with a lag. The change in the quantity of money comes about through a random process of discovery that does not permit anyone to deduce the aggregate amount discovered when the change actually occurs.
Published In: Journal of Political Economy
(Vol. 105, No. 6, December 1997, pp. 1293-1307)
Download Paper (PDF)