Skip to main content

Assessing Maximum Employment

Institute Working Paper 121 | Published November 25, 2025

Download PDF

Authors

Christopher Foote
Christopher FooteFederal Reserve Bank of Boston
Default people image

Shigeru Fujita

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Amanda Michaud
Amanda MichaudPrincipal Research Economist, Institute
Default people image

Joshua Montes

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Assessing Maximum Employment

Abstract

We suggest a core set of indicators for evaluating the position of the labor market relative to maximum employment. The unemployment rate remains the key indicator of the cyclical position of the labor market, as it is time-tested, is highly correlated with other indicators, and has practical measurement advantages. But other indicators can provide complementary evidence to get a fuller picture of the labor market. A joint analysis of job vacancies and unemployment in a Beveridge curve diagram is helpful when structural shocks affect the labor market and when the labor market is very tight, while the employment-to-population ratio is useful late in expansions, when increases in employment tend to arise from higher labor force participation. Additional indicators—including wage growth and worker flows—can complement the core indicators we discuss. We draw on lessons from the Global Financial Crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic to evaluate the effectiveness of various indicators.